FP Newspapers Inc (TSE:FP)

Web Site
Google Finance
SEDAR Filing

July 26, 2012
2011 Data
All data is for FPLP, which FPI held 49% interest of it. 
Check list:
1.Major Business.
Newspapers: Winnipeg Free Press, Brandon Sun,etc.  Derksen Printing.
Segments: as 2010,  Ads: 67%, Circulation: 26%, Printing: 3%. Digital: 2%.
Seasonality: Fourth quarter the best, First quarter the weakest.

2.Balance sheet.
Recent Price: $4.00, Tangible book value: <$0: , Share outstanding: $14m, Market Cap: $56m.
Debt: $49m .

3.Credit facility.
at June 2012, $50 with HSBC, Banker's  acceptance rates + 1.75%-2.75%. $48.3m outstanding. $1m principle payment/year. Expire at Jan. 31, 2016

4.Financial data by years.
2011201020092008200720062005200420032002
Revenue111110114121126122
Earning16.216.07.28.113.49.1
CF-WC19.521.412.613.418.615
CAPX3.70.50.52.02.01.5
Cash14.311.59.27.89.93.7
Debt50.355.260116*115.7119.7
Dividend10.110.89.5?11.8?12.1?11.5?
*include $57m notes ???

5.Cost structure
Leasing obligations. Flexible cost structure or fixed cost structure? Cost controls.

6.Insider holding, options, Insider trading info, share buy back.
CanStar: 7m shares, 51%. controlled by Ronald Stern.
FPI: 6.9m shares, 49%.
4065565 Canada Inc. 1.67m shares of FPI. 24.2% of FPI. also controlled by Ronald Stern.

7.Management compensation.
Ronald Stern (CEO): $0.
Other 4 officers: around $1m/year for the past 3 years.

8.Employee numbers. Revenue/Employee. Compensation/Employee.
at 2011, 442. Including 362 unionized worker. Oct. 2002:  strike for 9 days.  Oct. 2008:  strike for 16 days.
Current contract is up for renew at June 30, 2013

9.Industry comparison.
At Winnipeg, adult reading rate: 39%, Compete with Winnipeg Sun (19%), Global Mail (4%).

10.Auditor
Better be among the big four.

11.Major events.
Business acquisition, law suit etc.

12.Comments.
Negative Side:
(1) Newspaper circulation is in steady decrease.

(2) Union worker strike.
(3) Pension plan underfunding.
(4) Dividend might decease.
(5) No tangible book value.

Positive Side:
(1) Decent FCF ( > 20% of Market Cap). Conservative CAPX.
(2) High dividend rate( >15%).
(3) Ronald Stern has a big portion and don't take salary. Other management were paid not much.



Updated Dec. 17, 2012

Close my position at small gains. The company is doing OK now. The management is capable and well ding good in near term and will keep cost low. I expect next years dividend will be $0.48 per/share. However, if we think about 5 or 10 years later. There is much uncertainty ahead for the company. With more likely go downward.  So it is better not to touch those stocks.


Dec. 16, 2014
Q3 2014 Data

Recent price $2.56, Tangible book value still < 0.



(1) The stock is recently down due to news release that starting Q4 2014, dividend will be cut to $0.08/quarter. Which make future yield around 12% based on current price. For past 3 years, dividend is $0.60/year.

(2) The company is doing a little better than I expected. While revenue is down, its EBITDA remains at $20m level. It continued paying $0.60/year dividend until this quarter. However, I estimate 2014's EBITDA number would decrease to around $17m.

(3) The maintenance CapX is about $1m/year which is $3m lower than depreciation expense.

(4) In 2010, it converted from income fund to a corporation. Thus the subordinate notes converted to common shares.

(5) In past 10 year, it had pay out pretax income of $115m. While equity changed very little. It is quite consistent with the $11.2m/year income. There is also $23m increase in net cash position. Which is caused by $3m deference mentioned above and also some pension over contribution as well.

(6) In recent 3 years, it paid around $3.5m/year in tax

(7) Using $17m EBITDA, $2m interest expense, $1m CapX, $3m in tax. It would generate $11m in cash. Dividend is around $4.5m/year. That would give it around another $6m in cash to pay debt or do other stuff.

(8) Current net debt is around $32m. Added current market cap $36m, its EV is less than $70m. While its earning before interest payment is close to $13m/year.

(9) In latest 3 years, it contributed a lot more than average in pension plan. It states that its because of discount rate change. Current fair value almost 5 times of 10 years before and employee number actually decreased. I feel there is some value exist in the pension funding.

 (10) In my opinion, this is much attractive price than $4.00 which is 2 years ago. The underline business wasn't that getting that bad, but the price dropped by 40% . Off course it is related to the dividend cut, but all the money saved still goes to stockholder. It might pay down the debt, or invest in new business. The management are quite decent and I think they would do a proper job. The major risk is still the down of the whole newspaper industry. But I think it will still be profitable for many years to go. Eventually it might switch to another business.  Only if it get worse too quickly which should keep an eye on.

Update
August 17, 2015 
Q2 2015 Data
Current Price $0.7
(1) On Q2 2015 release, the company cut dividend totally. 2Q 2015 EBIDTA is $6.9m compare to $7.9 in same period of 2014. CapX $0.5m.  Interest expense $0.8.

(2) The company does get worse than I expected. Last year it actually generated around $18m in EBIDTA. This year, it might just generate $12 to $14 in EBIDTA or even less. So my $17m EBIDTA estimate is not achievable anymore.  One of the reason is the customer continue switch to digital advertising, second reason is local economy is down which make advertisement suffers.

(3) The company paid down debt to $39m. Net debt now is $29m. If using $10m in EBIDTA, $1m in CapX, $1.6m in interest expense, $2m in tax. It still can generate over $5 in annual cash. I think the risk of a bankruptcy is low unless the business is getting really bad.

(4) Overall, it is sure a mistake to get into this stock, the lesson I learned is that swimming against the current is really hard. When get into a industry that is doomed, we must be extra careful. Although there always will be newspapers, it doesn't means this company will survive. The company is lack of a sound digital strategy which is big concern for me. Unfortunately I just ignored it.

(5) However, when compare to $5m in real income to just a $10m in total market Cap. Current price is more a reaction of dividend cut than the real business result. I do have a feeling that the business it not that bad. But again it remains to see. Should monitor it quarter by quarter closely.

Update
Nov. 16, 2015
Q3 2015 Data
Current price $0.65.
(1) First 3Q EBIDTA is $9.4m. Net debt is still $29m.


Mar. 10, 2016
Q4 2015 Data
Current price $0.45.
(1)Full year EBIDTA is $13.6m.  Net debt is around $28m. Pension asset value is $41m at year end. Pension contribution is $4m at 2015.  Pension discount rate is 4.05% compare to 4.9% year ago.




GSI Technology, Inc.(NASDAQ:GSIT)

Web Site
Google Finance
Filing


Dec. 01, 2014
2015 Q2 Data

1.Major Business.
SRAM and LLDRAM manufacturer. SRAM is high end fast response memory used mostly in server or router compare to DRAM which used in PC. Fast SRAM has a market size around $600m to $800m/year. LLDRAM is a newer RAM developed by the company and I guess its sales is still not significant.

The company was founded at 1995 by its CEO Shu, Lee-Lean  who was working for Sony for 5 years before that. Later at Aug. 2009 the company actually acquired the SRAM business from Sony for $5.2m.

2.Balance sheet.
Recent price is $5.16. Shares 23.7m. Market Cap around $122m. Tangible book value $4.25. Cash $63m. No debt.

3.Credit facility.
Not important

4.Financial data by years.

5.Insider holding, options, Insider trading info, share buy back.
CEO: 2.4m shares. Including 500k options.
Currently there are 5m+ options outstanding average price around $5.2. 6m+ more options to be issued.

6.Management compensation.
Top five around $2.5m/year.

7.Employee numbers. Revenue/Employee. Compensation/Employee.
At Mar. 2014 has 138 employees. 42 in R&D, 18 in Sales, 10 in Admin, 66 in Manufacturing.

8.Industry comparison.


9.Auditor
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

10.Major events.
(1)The major player in SRAM is Cypress which has annual sales in SRAM around $200m to $300m. Since 2011, it filed 4 patent lawsuits against GSIT and GSIT won first two. The other two have been combined to one and is still going on. As a defence, GSIT filed antitrust lawsuit against the company and currently is still in process. This has already cost GSIT extra $20m+ legal expense and will continue in incur in near future.


11.Comments.
(1) There are two major problems of the company.

One is the Cypress litigation issue it is still unknown how much will cost in the future. One good part of this is the company if the company win the antitrust lawsuit, it should get $30m+ in return. Personally I feel it has a higher chance to win than lost. Anyway, this is temporary issue and won't drive it out of business.

The other one is the revenue is down for the past 3 years as well. The major contributor of this is Cisco which purchased more from the company after Sony acquisition. Toped at 2011 and then down since. It might or might not related to the litigation.  If remove Cisco sales from revenue, they are around $45m $50m for the past several years and actually increased a little bit at 2014.

(2) In cash flow, there are others item $3m to $5m which is combine of stock options expense($2m/year), write down of inventory($700k to $2m), and amortization of bond premium($1.2m to $800k).  Options expense is around $2m/years.

(3)Go forward, estimate $50m revenue, 45% gross margin, it would generate $22.5m gross profit. Assume it would be $25m. Assume $10m in SG&A. $10m in R&D. it would leave $5m in EBIDTA.
Use just $1m in Capx. $0.5m in tax.  The real income is still just $3m to $4m.  We could add some of the cash flow item and the interest income($0.5m/year) for about $5m. It is still less than $10m.

(4) The stock is priced that either the LLDRAM will pick up the revenue, or they could win the antitrust lawsuit. With the heavy payment of management and big options pay out, it is not really cheap.


12.Links


Aug 28, 2015
Q1 2016 Data

Current price $4.63, Market Cap: $105m.

For 2015, the company's gross profit is $25m which is close to my estimate. However, R&D is actually $12m which makes the real EBIDTA is just $4m.

On positive side: first, it solved the litigation with Cypress, which means eventually its litigation expense would go down. Secondly at Q1 2016, the company's revenue and gross profit both are up for $1m.

Going forward, it might be able to make $28m in annual gross profit. Using $10m SG&A and $12m in R&D. It would generate around $6m in EBIDTA. $4.5m in real income. Using 9 times P/E. It is cheap at $40m.

There is a mistake in previous study that the large cash balance should be counted in valuation. If using 20% discount rate with 2 years time frame, the current value is $40m.

On a cash flow basis, it should be able to add around $3m to $4m to real income. Which added another $30m to $40m value.

When added discounted cash to the real earning power, its real worth is actually over $100m.

Risks:
1. Litigation expense might last very long time, this will the company operate in loss for quite a while, however, currently the FCF-WC is neutral.

2. RAM business might go down again.

May 12, 2016
Q4 2016 Data

Current price $3.85, Market Cap: $90m.

Full 2016 revenue $52.7m, Gross profit $26.7m. Legal expense: $6.7m.  SG&A including legal is $17.6m. R&D is $12m.  Cash+investment: $66m

Finally the legal expense down to $200k at Q4 2016. The company made a small loss and a positive cash flow at Q4 I guess.

The company acquired an Israel company MikaMonu at Nov. 2015 who is specialized on associative computing which enable memory computing to solve bus bottleneck between cpu and memory. It does make sense to me although it might not work at the end. GSIT paid $5m + $2.5m in future. MikaMonu will not have any income contribution until 2019. The company has less than 10 employee and I estimate $2m extra expense for GSIT.

In future, the company will have $24m to $25m running rate of SG&A+ R&D. It profit should be able to maintain at above $25m level. So it would be just profitable. Cash side, it might be little more given $3m level in the others non-cash items.

Overall, with litigation expense is finally down. The company is more likely to make a profit in the future.  Currently stock price is just about 85% of book value which is quite cheap. However, whether the new acquisition will work remains unknown and takes a long time to see the result(at 2019).