POLARIS INFRASTRUCTURE INC(TSE:PIF)

Web Site
Polaris Energy
Google Finance
Filing
Polaris Geothermal Filing

July 21, 2017
Q1 2017
Current Price: $16.58, Cap: $255m

1.Basic Information
(1) History 
Previously the company was called Polaris Geothermal. It was found at 2003 as a holding company to acquire interest on Nicaraguan San Jacinto Geothermal Power Plant. It IPOed at 2004 through reverse merger.  At 2009 through it combine with other 2 public(Western GeoPower, GTO Resources) and 1 private(Ram power). It also raised $180m at the IPO. The name was changed to Ram power.

By 2010, there are 10MW at the Nicaraguan power plant is up and running. There was a two-phase expansion plan for the Power Plant. Both are 36MW. Phase I completed at the end of 2011 and cost around $200m.  Once it is up, the original 10MW was actually replaced by the Phase I. Phase II was completed at end of 2012 with spending of $200m as well.

By 2013, the power plant in full running and generated over $46m in revenue and $40m in gross profit.

By 2014, the company has accumulated over $360m in losses and around $230m in net debt. The company has several other projects. Millions of $ had been spent. Almost all went bad.

At 2015, the company go through a debt restructuring and wiped out old shareholders.  It received USD $60m and converted some debt to shares.  Reappointed new management. By the end of 2015, the total debt is $180m. Net debt is $120m.

By 2016, Total debt is over $170m. Net debt is around $130m.


(2) Business:

(3) Management.
Marc Murnaghan is the new CEO since 2015. Previously he was an investment banker and has experience in corporate financing. He seems did quite a good job in reducing expense etc. His payment is quite low and more by options.


(4) Debt and Credit Facility.
Phase I senior debt: $37.8m, 7.63%, Mature at 2024. It has a clause to lower interest by 1.5% if capacity reaches a goal.
Phase I sub debt: $13.8m, 6%, Mature at 2025. It has some yield enhancement which is a % of EBITDA.
Phase II senior debt: $103.6m,  Mature at 2028. Interest same as Phase I senior.
Phase II sub debt: $18.9m, Mature at 2029. Interest same as Phase I sub.

(5) Insider holding, options, Insider trading info, share buyback.
Marc owns around 370k shares.

(6) Employee numbers

(7) Industry comparison.
Nicaragua seems has another Geothermal plant which is called Momotombo and started in 1983 with 35MW. At 1989 another 35MW added. Due to low injection and bad maintenance, by 1999 the total capacity dropped to only 12MW. The owner ORMAT drilled 4 new wells and added a 7.5MW binary plant. Total capacity brought back to $35MW in 2003.   At 2013, total capacity including the binary plant is only 25MW. For the ten years, each year 1MW capacity was lost.


(8) Major events



2. Financial data.
3. Valuation
(1) The Geothermal power generally has a low depletion rate which is only 3% to 4%. Given its size, I estimate each year around 2MW capacity will be lost. To compensate that, every 3 years a new well needs to be drilled and added 5MW to 6MW. That cost is close to $10m which is around $3.5m/year.

(2) Currently, it generates over $55m in revenue and over $48m in gross profit. SG&A is going down in last years and set at $4m currently. Interest expense is around $15m/year. Maintenance CapX is around $2m/year. Capacity compensation $3.5m/year. Currently, the company still needs to drill an additional 2 to 3 wells cost around $7.5m/well. Maybe a new binary plant which might cost $30m. The company doesn't need to pay tax until 2022.

(3)At Q2, it seems to increase its output to 59MW compare to 50MW in the previous year. This might significantly increase its revenue and profit for Q2.

(3) Using $45m EBITDA, $5m CapX, $15m interest. Its net income could be $25m. Since it is in USD. It well supports the current CAD$260m market cap.

(4) If the company increase its capacity to 70MW, it might be able to reduce the interest rate of senior debt.

4. Risk
(1) The company has a long messy history. It might the major reason that the stock is low. The new management seems to do quite a good job after the reorganization.

(2) The operation might be interrupted and power generate might decrease.

(3) The new well and binary project still need quite a lot of spending.

(4) Although depletion is low. It still needs to keep investing to maintain the same output level. Don't know $3.5m compensation CapX is sufficient.

(5) The debt is still a little high. I wish it can be reduced to below $100m level.

5. Conclusion
The company currently is much safer than before. Currently, the price is very reasonable. There is more upside if new wells and project be finished.

6.Links

Mar. 07, 2019
Year 2018 data
Price $11.0, Shares: 15.7, Cap: $172m, Warrant &options around 2m.
(1) The company acquired 3 hydro plants in Peru in a total of 33MW and expect to be operational by the end of 2019.  There are other large plants in the early stage as well. The company issued 600k shares and another  900k warrant for the acquisition. Took over $40m+ debt at 0% interest valued at $24m on the book. There is a 5MW plant is running. The rest 2 plants of 28m could need $35m to complete in 2019.

(2) Full-year 2018 EBITDA around $58m. Interest expense around $17m. Dividend $10m. Paid down around $13m in debt. Total debt increased to $187m because of the Peru acquisition. Gross debt is around $207m.

(3) The company did very well in Nicaragua operation. If not for the new acquisition, it will be able to pay down debt much faster. Currently, its FCF just barely be able to cover its capital need. However, as long as the current plant is stable, it should be able to construct the new plants without much capital risk.




Real Matters Inc(TSE:REAL)

Web Site
Google Finance
Filing


July 21, 2017
Q2 2017, Year end Sept. 30
Current Price: $9.12, Cap: $790m

1.Basic Information
(1) History
Real matters was found by Jason Smith at 2004. Till IPO at May 2017, the company has raised over $200m CAD. The company's main focus is on mortgage appraiser service. It is trying to use technology to bring more efficiency and improve quality of property appraising.  At 2016, it entered title and close service market through acquisition.

(2) Business related:
90% of its business is from US and 10% from Canada. As it tied to mortgage market, the winter quarter Dec. 31 and Mar 31 generally has much lower revenue than the other 2 quarters.

Currently its appraisal business accounts around 5% of total U.S mortgage appraisal market. Title and close accounts only 0.6% of U.S total volume.

It is customer retention rate is real high at 95%. Its organic growth rate is at least 20%.

(3) Management.
Jason Smith is the key person. Since childhood, he worked for mortgage industry and found a mortgage related online company called Basis100 and it was sold at $33m at 2004. After that, he founded Real Matters at scratch and gradually grew it organically till now. He seems to be a very good sales person and a very capable manager.

Ryan Smith, Very likely is Jason's brother. He worked with Jason at basis100 and now he is CTO of Real matters.

(4) Debt and Credit facility.
Current debt is around $15m.

(5) Insider holding, options, Insider trading info, share buy back.
Joson Smith: ???  All management together 7.2m shares. 8.2%
Altus Group Limited: 10.5m shares. 12%.
EdgePoint: 7.4m shares, 8.5%
AGF:  5.1m shares, 5.7%
Urbana: 3.1m shares,  3.6%.
Fiera: 1.3m shares, 1.4%.
Mosaic: 1.5m shares, 1.7%.
WhiteCap:
Wellington:
Total insider and major institutional holder(>0.5%) holds 76% of total shares and has been locked up for 180 days after IPO.

Currently there are 5.4m options outstanding.


(6) Employee numbers

(7) Industry comparison.

(8) Major events
On January 2013 - Acquired Kirchmeyer & Associates (Buffalo, NY), an Appraisal Management Company. Amount not knowing.

On May 1, 2015, it acquired Southwest Financial Services for $27m. It seems generates $44m annual revenue at 2016.

On April 2016, it acquired Linear Title & Closing Ltd for USD $98m. It paid $44m in cash, $22m in stock, and rest $32m is contingent payment. It seems generates around $65m annual revenue at 2016.


2. Financial data.
2013: 85m. 

3. Valuation
The company was FCF positive since 2011. Currently it makes very little or incurs small losses. It is hard to valuate from a profit basis.

On revenue side, it is expected to generate USD$350m revenue at 2017. And the growth rate is expected to be 20% to 25%. The company targeted by 2021, its appraisal market share grow to 15% to 20%, based on $2.5B market, it is $400m to $500m. By 2021, its title and close market share grow to 1% to 3%. Based on $13B markt, its $130m to $400m. In total, it is target $500m to $900m revenue by then. Using medium $700m, that is around $870m in CAD$. Adding another 10% Canada side, the revenue is close to $950m CAD$ by then.

Use 10% net income and 25P/E  it might support $2.5B market cap by then. Current share count is around 86m, by then it might exceed 100m.

If based on current estimate USD$350m revenue for 2017, it is around CAD$420m. Current market cap $790m is less than 2 times of revenue.

4. Risk
(1) Mortgage market might  slow down both US and Canada. However, its market share is small and it is quite disruptive. Overall I am not overall worried about this.

(2) Growth might be slower or even no growth.

(3) It might not be profitable for a while.

(4) It is a very new IPO and some older share holder might choose to exit once lockout time ends.

5. Conclusion
It is a very high growth and well managed company. It could be a good one if it can achieve the growth and profitability.


6.Links



NamSys Inc(CVE:CTZ)

Web Site
Google Finance
Filing


July 14, 2017
Q2 2017, Year end Oct. 31
Current Price: $0.79, Cap: $24m

1.Basic Information
(1) History
The company previously was called CencoTech, was created at 1997 by Barry Spark as an acquisition vehicle. It was traded on Alberta Exchange from 1997 and moved to CVE at 1999. At 1998 it acquired the NamSys which is founded by John Siemens??. At the purchase time, Barry controls 32% and  John control 24% of the total shares.

 The company is main product is cash and deposit management software for banks. It has several products which works for different parts of the cash circle. It also sell some ATM like hardware. At the beginning, its revenue is on software license. Its revenue grew from $1m at 1998 to over $3.7m at 2002. Then fall down to $1m to 2007. After that, revenue stuck the same level for main years. Also the revenue is not much, the company was able to stay profitable since 2010.

Since 2008, it branded its service system as Device Dashbroad Service. The service revenue grew from $0.4m at 2008 to $0.8m at 2013.

At 2012, it discontinued its hardware related business.

Since 2013, it starts to offer its software as SaaS(software as a service). Late branded it as Cirreon. It seems doing quite well and be able to grow service revenue from $0.8m at 2013 to $1.7m at 2016.

(2) Business related:
Currency Controller: This is a software system that is used in cash circle. Still its main software revenue source, which might account 30%.

SaaS: This is the service it offered, it should include the Currency controller and some others together as a service.  Currently around 70% of the revenue is from the SaaS part.

"ATM":  The ATM style hardware to handle check or dispense coins etc. The margins are much lower than software.  Discontinued at 2012.

Gross margin is above 70% and EBIDTA margin around 40%.

(3) Management.
Spark is the main person for this company. He was there since the beginning.

(4) Debt and Credit facility.
Currently no debt.

(5) Insider holding, options, Insider trading info, share buy back.
Currently Spark owns 10m shares, around 37%.

(6) Employee numbers

(7) Industry comparison.

(8) Major events
At Dec. 2006, it sold its hardware related IP and distribution rights for $1.5m.

2. Financial data.

3. Valuation
(1) The company's margin is over 70% and EBITDA is over 40%. Current revenue stream is around $2.5m. That is close to $1m in real income since the company won't need to pay tax in the near future. Compare to $24m market cap. It is around 24 P/E.

(2) Based on the growth at its SaaS part. It has been quite consistent and doing very well since 2015. Current running rate is over $2m/year.

4. Risk
(1) The company has quite a long history. It is hard to tell what is the cause of revenue growth for last 3 years. Don't know whether the trend can be kept.

(2) For many years the company was just hanging there. The management wasn't that strong. However, it does maintain profitable even at very low revenue level during 2010 to 2012.

5. Conclusion
It could be a good one if trend continues. The price has gone up quite a lot during past 3 years. Current price is not really cheap. I wish the price could be cheaper.

6.Links


Oct. 03, 2017
Price $0.71. Cap $19.4m
(1) The company released Q3 2017 data, revenue and gross margin kind of flat compare to last year. Net income is lower than last year mainly caused by increase in compensation cost.

(2) However, the SaaS revenue now is around $640k which is much higher than last quarter. Cash now is around $1.5m with no debt.

(3) Assume $4m SaaS revenue at year 2019. Total revenue $4.5m. $2m net income. $4m in cash. Using 15 P/E. 27.3m shares. Remove the cash, it should worth around $1.25 at that time.

Jan. 31, 2018
Price $0.6. Cap $16m
(1) For full year 2017, revenue is $2.9m compare to $2.4m in 2016. Net income around $900k compare to $800k at 2016.

(2) SaaS revenue for 2017 is around $2.3m, cash $1.7m compare to $0.6m at 2016. Increased by $1.1m because there are some tax losses utilized.

(3) It might not be easy to achieve a $2m income at 2019. However, as over $1m cash/year been accumulated, it could utilize it in some way like a dividend or an acquisition etc. 

Avante Logixx Inc(CVE:XX)

Web Site
Google Finance
Filing


July 06, 2017
Q3 2017, Year end Mar. 31. 
Current Price: $0.335

1.Basic Information
(1) History
The company was founded by Emmanuel Mounouchos at 1996. It was IPOed at 2007. George Rossolatos invested and joined the company at 2010. Since then it is quite profitable and made several acquisitions. At 2015, Mounouchos was ousted with $0.5m one time payment.


(2) Business related:
 The company's main business is security solutions for high end residential or commercial real estate. It is a niche market player in Toronto. The several company it acquired are all kind of related to its business. 1) Home security, it is a combine of its original Avante and the acquired LVS at 2015. This is its main business. The RMR is around $500k which equals $6m/year.  2)Home automation, This is from its INTO acquisition at 2014, seems also include security for condos. 3)Locksmith, this is from the CWL acquistion at 2016. No recurring revenue.  4) Another security based.

(3) Management.
George Rossolatos is the current CEO and the key person. He was a pretty success investment manager at private equity fund. He invested and joined the company at co-CEO at 2010 to turn the company around. At 2015, he became the sole CEO. I think he did quite a good job managing the company and made several quite successful acquisitions.

(4) Debt and Credit facility.
Currently on debt and has around $1.1m in cash

(5) Insider holding, options, Insider trading info, share buy back.
Mounouchos : He still owns 15.7m shares which is around 19%.
Rossolatos : He owns 6.8m shares which is around 8.5%.

(6) Employee numbers

(7) Industry comparison.

(8) Major events



2. Financial data.


3. Valuation
(1) Currently its recurring revenue RMR is just about $500k. If using 50xRMR, it worths just $25m. However, both the INTO and the CWL business are not recurring in nature. It should be added to the valuation.

(2) Currently the company just earn 10% EBITDA which is around $2m/year. Assuming $0.5m CapX. It is real earning is around $1.5m. Current $26m market cap is not too bad.

(3) If it can grow its revenue to $25m level and bring EBITDA to $2.5m. Then it will be more attractive.

4. Risk
(1) Real estate slowdown might affect some part of its business like the condo or the locksmith.


5. Conclusion
It is quite a fair price at current profit level. If the company can continue to grow revenue and maintains the EBITDA margin, it can be a good one.

6.Links

https://www.linkedin.com/in/rossolatos/

http://www.riverdalecapital.com/ 

http://vimeo.com/37351819 

https://twitter.com/rossolatos